<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to fix fatherhood in America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lyved.com/family/how-to-fix-fatherhood-in-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lyved.com/family/how-to-fix-fatherhood-in-america/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:23:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Galasetti</title>
		<link>http://www.lyved.com/family/how-to-fix-fatherhood-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-8191</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Galasetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyved.com/?p=2580#comment-8191</guid>
		<description>Hey Randy,

Sorry, your comment got tossed in the spam section.

Glad you liked this article and topic. And glad to see that you&#039;re helping bring the topic to light as well.

-Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Randy,</p>
<p>Sorry, your comment got tossed in the spam section.</p>
<p>Glad you liked this article and topic. And glad to see that you&#8217;re helping bring the topic to light as well.</p>
<p>-Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Galasetti</title>
		<link>http://www.lyved.com/family/how-to-fix-fatherhood-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-8186</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Galasetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyved.com/?p=2580#comment-8186</guid>
		<description>Hi &quot;SolomonSez&quot;,

Thanks for bringing this side of the issue forward.

I also believe that the concept of visitations is broken. It just doesn&#039;t seem to work out right for the two parents and children involved.

-Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8220;SolomonSez&#8221;,</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing this side of the issue forward.</p>
<p>I also believe that the concept of visitations is broken. It just doesn&#8217;t seem to work out right for the two parents and children involved.</p>
<p>-Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolomonSez</title>
		<link>http://www.lyved.com/family/how-to-fix-fatherhood-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-8183</link>
		<dc:creator>SolomonSez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyved.com/?p=2580#comment-8183</guid>
		<description>It is hypocritical or at least nonsensical for anyone to &#039;preach&#039;, suggest policy changes, or exhort others to &quot;think differently&quot; about fatherhood, unless one is ALSO demanding that our divorce courts cease handing out ANY &quot;parenting-unfriendly visitation schedules&quot; (or &#039;parenting schedules&#039; as they are sometimes called).  Those schedules, typified as &quot;every other weekend overnights throughout the school year&quot; are not only damaging to children, but they act as a social statement by our courts on the value of fatherhood (since it is presumed, and is largely true, that 90% of those impacted by these schedules are divorced fathers).  

In effect, our courts&#039; presumptions on what constitutes a reasonable balance in the parenting schedules of two divorcing parents, is in effect a &#039;default value&#039; for fatherhood in America.

Organizations like the Children&#039;s Rights Council have worked hard over the last 30 years to reform these court presumptions (called &#039;protocols&#039; in many states).   But where are all those claiming to be concerned about fatherhood, coming out in support of those reforms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hypocritical or at least nonsensical for anyone to &#8216;preach&#8217;, suggest policy changes, or exhort others to &#8220;think differently&#8221; about fatherhood, unless one is ALSO demanding that our divorce courts cease handing out ANY &#8220;parenting-unfriendly visitation schedules&#8221; (or &#8216;parenting schedules&#8217; as they are sometimes called).  Those schedules, typified as &#8220;every other weekend overnights throughout the school year&#8221; are not only damaging to children, but they act as a social statement by our courts on the value of fatherhood (since it is presumed, and is largely true, that 90% of those impacted by these schedules are divorced fathers).  </p>
<p>In effect, our courts&#8217; presumptions on what constitutes a reasonable balance in the parenting schedules of two divorcing parents, is in effect a &#8216;default value&#8217; for fatherhood in America.</p>
<p>Organizations like the Children&#8217;s Rights Council have worked hard over the last 30 years to reform these court presumptions (called &#8216;protocols&#8217; in many states).   But where are all those claiming to be concerned about fatherhood, coming out in support of those reforms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.lyved.com/family/how-to-fix-fatherhood-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-8165</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyved.com/?p=2580#comment-8165</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew,

Thanks for helping to bring more attention to this major problem in our society. 

Unfortunately, I have found that most men are like us, they have a difficult time giving to their children what they did not receive themselves. In other words, men can not give out of a &quot;void&quot; in their own life. 

My story is similar to yours,
(see http://thedashguy.com/blog/about/). 

Therefore; I am now sharing the things I have learned with other men to try and break the &quot;cycle&quot; of fatherlessness in our communities. 

Keep up the good work!!

Randy Clark
The &quot;DASH&quot; Guy
randyclark@thedashguy.com
www.thedashguy.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>Thanks for helping to bring more attention to this major problem in our society. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, I have found that most men are like us, they have a difficult time giving to their children what they did not receive themselves. In other words, men can not give out of a &#8220;void&#8221; in their own life. </p>
<p>My story is similar to yours,<br />
(see <a href="http://thedashguy.com/blog/about/)" rel="nofollow">http://thedashguy.com/blog/about/)</a>. </p>
<p>Therefore; I am now sharing the things I have learned with other men to try and break the &#8220;cycle&#8221; of fatherlessness in our communities. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work!!</p>
<p>Randy Clark<br />
The &#8220;DASH&#8221; Guy<br />
<a href="mailto:randyclark@thedashguy.com">randyclark@thedashguy.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.thedashguy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedashguy.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Galasetti</title>
		<link>http://www.lyved.com/family/how-to-fix-fatherhood-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-8129</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Galasetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyved.com/?p=2580#comment-8129</guid>
		<description>Education and positive influence is the biggest and best solution. There really can&#039;t be any laws that force people to be better parents or to be there for their kids. It has been something that&#039;s taught and people need to be lead by example.

-Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Education and positive influence is the biggest and best solution. There really can&#8217;t be any laws that force people to be better parents or to be there for their kids. It has been something that&#8217;s taught and people need to be lead by example.</p>
<p>-Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
